Enter your domain to get your AI Visibility Score, AI Share of Voice and a competitor benchmark across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI — computed from real model responses.
Check your AI visibility →Top B2B SaaS Companies Most Recommended by AI
The definitive ranking of which B2B SaaS companies AI assistants recommend most — measured across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity using real buyer-intent prompts. No estimates, no fabricated scores.
About this research
Surfora is an AI Visibility Intelligence platform that measures brand visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI. This report is built only from real responses collected across those assistants — every score, share and ranking is computed from collected model output, never estimated or fabricated.
Surfora's metrics
Every ranking on this page is built on two proprietary Surfora metrics:
The percentage of all weighted AI recommendations a brand captures across the major assistants — the AI equivalent of market share.
A 0–100 measure of how prominently and consistently a brand is recommended, blending mention frequency, average position, cross-model coverage, category relevance and sentiment. Shown throughout as the AI Visibility Score.
Surfora (2026). AI Recommendation Share Rankings: Top B2B SaaS Companies Most Recommended by AI. Surfora AI Visibility Intelligence. https://surfora.ai/reports/b2b-saas-ai-visibility-rankingsKey findings
The strongest, data-backed conclusions from this run — each derived directly from the collected model responses.
- HubSpot is the most-recommended B2B SaaS company across the major AI models, with an AI Visibility Score of 68.4 out of 100 and 9.2% of all AI share of voice.
- AI recommendations are highly concentrated: the top 10 brands capture 35.0% of all AI share of voice, and the top 20 capture 52.8% — a winner-takes-most market.
- Only 71 of 91 ranked companies are named by all four models — consistent cross-model presence (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity) is rare.
- Every company in the Top 20 appears in all four major AI models — the leaders are unanimous across assistants, not the artifact of a single model.
- AI recommendations extend well beyond CRM: Greenhouse is the highest-ranked Recruitment Software brand at #4 overall.
- Venture-backed challengers outrank far larger incumbents — in CRM, Zoho (Private (bootstrapped)) sits at #3, ahead of Capsule (Private) at #88.
- The Top 10 alone spans 7 different software categories — AI assistants spread their recommendations across the B2B stack, not just one niche.
- 10 categories have a distinct AI front-runner, from CRM (HubSpot) to Finance SaaS (Ramp).
AI Visibility leaders
The 20 most AI-visible B2B SaaS brands by Recommendation Authority Score (RAS) — our 0–100 measure, shown here as the AI Visibility Score — computed from real model responses.
AI Share of Voice
HubSpot captures 9.2% of all weighted AI mentions — the largest single share of voice in the index. The top 20 brands together hold 52.8%.
AI Recommendation Share (ARS)
AI Recommendation Share (ARS) is the AI equivalent of market share: the percentage of all weighted AI recommendations a brand captures when buyers ask the major assistants. The brands below own the largest share of the AI conversation.
| # | Company | AI Recommendation Share |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.2% | |
| 2 | 6.8% | |
| 3 | 4.4% | |
| 4 | 3.7% | |
| 5 | 3.1% | |
| 6 | 2.7% | |
| 7 | 2.7% | |
| 8 | 2.6% | |
| 9 | 2.3% | |
| 10 | 2.2% | |
| 11 | 2.0% | |
| 12 | 1.9% | |
| 13 | 1.9% | |
| 14 | 1.8% | |
| 15 | 1.8% |
Biggest surprises
What stands out when you read the index closely — the talking points behind the numbers.
Winners & losers
Which companies punch above their funding weight — and which large, well-funded brands AI under-recommends. Based on 91 ranked companies with researched funding data.
Overperformers
Seed–Series C brands ranking in the Top 20
Underperformers
Series D+/public brands ranked in the bottom third
Visibility vs funding stage
Each dot is a ranked company; the red line marks the average AI Visibility Score for each funding tier. AI visibility is not simply a function of how much a company has raised.
Rankings by category
This flagship index rolls up our per-category leaderboards. Explore which brands AI recommends most in each niche:
Top 50 CRM →
Top 50 Recruitment Software →
Top 50 Compliance Software →
Top 50 Sales Tech →
Top 50 Customer Support →
Top 50 Project Management →
Top 50 Product Analytics →
Top 50 HR Tech →
Top 50 Marketing Automation →
Top 50 Finance SaaS →
Why these companies rank where they do
A closer read of the top 10 — each profile describes exactly what the data shows about that company's AI visibility: its score, how many models name it, its AI Recommendation Share and its category standing. No causes are inferred beyond the measured figures.
Why HubSpot ranks #1
HubSpot ranks #1 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 68.4 out of 100, the highest of any B2B SaaS company measured. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 9.2% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within CRM, HubSpot ranks #1, ahead of Salesforce. When AI assistants name it, HubSpot appears at an average position of 2.5 in their answers. Its funding stage is Public. Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Salesforce ranks #2
Salesforce ranks #2 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 63.0 out of 100, placing it among the three most AI-visible brands overall. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 6.8% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within CRM, Salesforce ranks #2, ahead of Zoho. When AI assistants name it, Salesforce appears at an average position of 3.4 in their answers. Its funding stage is Public. Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Zoho ranks #3
Zoho ranks #3 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 57.8 out of 100, placing it among the three most AI-visible brands overall. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 4.4% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within CRM, Zoho ranks #3, ahead of Pipedrive. When AI assistants name it, Zoho appears at an average position of 4.3 in their answers. It reaches this visibility as a Private (bootstrapped) company, ahead of larger, better-funded rivals. Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Greenhouse ranks #4
Greenhouse ranks #4 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 56.9 out of 100, inside the top 10 of the entire index. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 2.0% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within Recruitment Software, Greenhouse ranks #1, ahead of Ashby. When AI assistants name it, Greenhouse appears at an average position of 1.6 in their answers. Its funding stage is Private (PE). Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Vanta ranks #5
Vanta ranks #5 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 56.7 out of 100, inside the top 10 of the entire index. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 1.0% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within Compliance Software, Vanta ranks #1, ahead of Drata. When AI assistants name it, Vanta appears at an average position of 1.7 in their answers. Its funding stage is Late stage. Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Cognism ranks #6
Cognism ranks #6 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 56.0 out of 100, inside the top 10 of the entire index. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 0.8% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within Sales Tech, Cognism ranks #1, ahead of Apollo.io. When AI assistants name it, Cognism appears at an average position of 2.4 in their answers. It reaches this visibility as a Series C company, ahead of larger, better-funded rivals. Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Zendesk ranks #7
Zendesk ranks #7 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 56.0 out of 100, inside the top 10 of the entire index. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 3.1% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within Customer Support, Zendesk ranks #1, ahead of Intercom. When AI assistants name it, Zendesk appears at an average position of 2.8 in their answers. Its funding stage is Private (PE). Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Atlassian ranks #8
Atlassian ranks #8 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 55.7 out of 100, inside the top 10 of the entire index. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 3.7% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within Project Management, Atlassian ranks #1, ahead of ClickUp. When AI assistants name it, Atlassian appears at an average position of 4.5 in their answers. Its funding stage is Public. Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Ashby ranks #9
Ashby ranks #9 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 55.1 out of 100, inside the top 10 of the entire index. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 1.2% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within Recruitment Software, Ashby ranks #2, ahead of Lever. When AI assistants name it, Ashby appears at an average position of 3.5 in their answers. It reaches this visibility as a Series C company, ahead of larger, better-funded rivals. Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
Why Mixpanel ranks #10
Mixpanel ranks #10 of 91 with an AI Visibility Score of 55.0 out of 100, inside the top 10 of the entire index. It is named by all four major AI models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and captures 2.7% of all weighted AI recommendations — its AI Recommendation Share, the AI equivalent of market share.
Within Product Analytics, Mixpanel ranks #1, ahead of Amplitude. When AI assistants name it, Mixpanel appears at an average position of 1.9 in their answers. It reaches this visibility as a Series C company, ahead of larger, better-funded rivals. Every figure here is computed from real model responses — not estimated.
The full ranking
Every score below is computed from real model responses — never estimated. The AI Visibility Score (0–100) blends mention frequency, average position, model coverage, category relevance and sentiment. Models shows how many of the four major assistants name the company.
| # | Company | AI Visibility Score | AI Share of Voice | Avg. position | Mentions | Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68.4 | 9.2% | 2.5 | 220 | 4/4 | |
| 2 | 63.0 | 6.8% | 3.4 | 186 | 4/4 | |
| 3 | 57.8 | 4.4% | 4.3 | 123 | 4/4 | |
| 4 | 56.9 | 2.0% | 1.6 | 35 | 4/4 | |
| 5 | 56.7 | 1.0% | 1.7 | 16 | 4/4 | |
| 6 | 56.0 | 0.8% | 2.4 | 12 | 4/4 | |
| 7 | 56.0 | 3.1% | 2.8 | 72 | 4/4 | |
| 8 | 55.7 | 3.7% | 4.5 | 116 | 4/4 | |
| 9 | 55.1 | 1.2% | 3.5 | 22 | 4/4 | |
| 10 | 55.0 | 2.7% | 1.9 | 73 | 4/4 | |
| 11 | 54.9 | 2.7% | 1.4 | 71 | 4/4 | |
| 12 | 54.8 | 2.2% | 3.3 | 48 | 4/4 | |
| 13 | 54.8 | 2.3% | 2.3 | 48 | 4/4 | |
| 14 | 54.6 | 1.0% | 2.0 | 20 | 4/4 | |
| 15 | 54.5 | 1.8% | 2.4 | 37 | 4/4 | |
| 16 | 54.4 | 2.6% | 3.0 | 65 | 4/4 | |
| 17 | 54.4 | 1.9% | 2.6 | 40 | 4/4 | |
| 18 | 54.4 | 1.6% | 2.3 | 31 | 4/4 | |
| 19 | 54.3 | 0.9% | 2.3 | 16 | 4/4 | |
| 20 | 54.2 | 0.8% | 3.4 | 15 | 4/4 | |
| 21 | 53.9 | 1.8% | 2.7 | 42 | 4/4 | |
| 22 | 53.6 | 0.7% | 3.1 | 13 | 4/4 | |
| 23 | 53.6 | 0.8% | 3.5 | 16 | 4/4 | |
| 24 | 53.3 | 1.6% | 2.0 | 36 | 4/4 | |
| 25 | 53.0 | 1.8% | 3.3 | 42 | 4/4 | |
| 26 | 53.0 | 1.7% | 1.9 | 39 | 4/4 | |
| 27 | 52.5 | 1.1% | 3.9 | 25 | 4/4 | |
| 28 | 52.3 | 1.6% | 3.4 | 43 | 4/4 | |
| 29 | 52.1 | 1.0% | 4.2 | 21 | 4/4 | |
| 30 | 52.0 | 1.8% | 4.0 | 48 | 4/4 | |
| 31 | 51.9 | 1.0% | 3.4 | 23 | 4/4 | |
| 32 | 51.9 | 1.8% | 1.5 | 45 | 4/4 | |
| 33 | 51.8 | 1.2% | 3.8 | 28 | 4/4 | |
| 34 | 51.1 | 1.0% | 3.9 | 24 | 4/4 | |
| 35 | 50.9 | 1.9% | 5.0 | 63 | 4/4 | |
| 36 | 50.9 | 0.9% | 2.4 | 22 | 4/4 | |
| 37 | 50.7 | 1.3% | 3.6 | 35 | 4/4 | |
| 38 | 50.7 | 0.3% | 1.0 | 8 | 4/4 | |
| 39 | 50.7 | 0.7% | 4.1 | 17 | 4/4 | |
| 40 | 50.6 | 0.6% | 3.7 | 15 | 4/4 | |
| 41 | 50.5 | 0.3% | 2.0 | 6 | 4/4 | |
| 42 | 50.5 | 0.4% | 1.0 | 9 | 4/4 | |
| 43 | 50.2 | 0.6% | 3.2 | 15 | 4/4 | |
| 44 | 50.2 | 0.5% | 3.4 | 13 | 4/4 | |
| 45 | 49.8 | 1.2% | 5.1 | 41 | 4/4 | |
| 46 | 49.6 | 0.9% | 3.3 | 29 | 4/4 | |
| 47 | 49.6 | 0.5% | 5.4 | 13 | 4/4 | |
| 48 | 49.6 | 0.9% | 3.7 | 26 | 4/4 | |
| 49 | 49.6 | 1.7% | 2.8 | 59 | 4/4 | |
| 50 | 49.5 | 0.9% | 4.3 | 30 | 4/4 | |
| 51 | 49.4 | 1.0% | 4.1 | 32 | 4/4 | |
| 52 | 49.1 | 0.8% | 4.8 | 22 | 4/4 | |
| 53 | 48.9 | 0.4% | 3.0 | 11 | 4/4 | |
| 54 | 48.8 | 0.3% | 4.7 | 8 | 4/4 | |
| 55 | 48.6 | 0.8% | 4.0 | 24 | 4/4 | |
| 56 | 48.5 | 0.8% | 2.8 | 24 | 4/4 | |
| 57 | 48.5 | 1.1% | 3.6 | 35 | 4/4 | |
| 58 | 48.4 | 0.5% | 5.7 | 14 | 4/4 | |
| 59 | 48.2 | 0.6% | 3.4 | 17 | 4/4 | |
| 60 | 48.1 | 0.3% | 5.4 | 10 | 4/4 | |
| 61 | 48.0 | 0.5% | 5.0 | 16 | 4/4 | |
| 62 | 47.8 | 1.0% | 6.0 | 38 | 4/4 | |
| 63 | 47.8 | 0.6% | 5.8 | 20 | 4/4 | |
| 64 | 47.6 | 0.5% | 5.4 | 19 | 4/4 | |
| 65 | 47.3 | 0.6% | 5.3 | 22 | 4/4 | |
| 66 | 46.8 | 0.7% | 5.0 | 24 | 4/4 | |
| 67 | 46.6 | 0.4% | 5.0 | 13 | 4/4 | |
| 68 | 46.4 | 0.3% | 7.7 | 12 | 4/4 | |
| 69 | 45.9 | 0.2% | 6.0 | 6 | 4/4 | |
| 70 | 45.1 | 0.3% | 6.3 | 12 | 4/4 | |
| 71 | 44.5 | 0.3% | 7.0 | 11 | 4/4 | |
| 72 | 44.1 | 0.4% | 4.4 | 9 | 3/4 | |
| 73 | 43.4 | 0.2% | 4.3 | 5 | 3/4 | |
| 74 | 43.3 | 0.2% | 2.0 | 7 | 3/4 | |
| 75 | 42.5 | 0.3% | 5.5 | 9 | 3/4 | |
| 76 | 42.3 | 0.2% | 3.0 | 8 | 3/4 | |
| 77 | 41.3 | 0.1% | 5.0 | 4 | 3/4 | |
| 78 | 40.4 | 0.1% | 8.0 | 4 | 3/4 | |
| 79 | 40.1 | 0.2% | 9.0 | 7 | 3/4 | |
| 80 | 39.5 | 0.1% | 4.0 | 2 | 2/4 | |
| 81 | 38.3 | 0.3% | 7.5 | 12 | 3/4 | |
| 82 | 37.4 | 0.1% | 0.0 | 3 | 3/4 | |
| 83 | 36.9 | 0.1% | 6.7 | 5 | 2/4 | |
| 84 | 35.3 | 0.1% | 6.0 | 3 | 2/4 | |
| 85 | 34.7 | 0.1% | 8.0 | 4 | 2/4 | |
| 86 | 34.7 | 0.1% | 0.0 | 4 | 2/4 | |
| 87 | 34.5 | 0.1% | 11.0 | 2 | 2/4 | |
| 88 | 34.4 | 0.1% | 6.5 | 3 | 2/4 | |
| 89 | 34.0 | 0.1% | 0.0 | 3 | 2/4 | |
| 90 | 33.9 | 0.1% | 0.0 | 2 | 2/4 | |
| 91 | 28.8 | 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | 1/4 |
Download the full report (PDF)
Get the complete ranking as a PDF — every ranked company with its AI Visibility Score, AI Share of Voice and average position, computed from real model responses. Enter your details and your download will start.
Thanks — your download is ready. If it didn't start automatically, use the button below.
Download the PDFWhat this report measures
- AI Visibility Score (0–100) — a weighted blend of mention frequency, average position, model coverage, category relevance and sentiment.
- AI Share of Voice — how much of the category's AI attention each brand captures.
- Category analysis — how recommendations concentrate across CRM, support, HR, sales, compliance and more.
- Funding-stage analysis — how AI visibility maps to company maturity, joined to real, researched funding metadata.
How it's built
We maintain a library of real buyer-intent prompts per category, run them across the major AI models on a recurring basis, and capture which companies are named and in what order. Scores are derived from those responses — read the full methodology for the exact weights and formulas.
Run a free snapshot across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI, or book a full audit to see where you stand against competitors.
Run a free AI-visibility audit